<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone development platform will wake up the mobile industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/379/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/379</link>
	<description>my little chunk of bandwidth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19814</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/379#comment-32718</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/379#comment-32718</guid>
		<description>Hi Enrique!

I hear what you&#039;re saying, but the argument assumes that Apple will hide native API&#039;s from their widget engine.  From the keynote, it sorta sounds like they will, but we don&#039;t know that for sure.  I entirely expect Apple to offer device-specific API&#039;s via JavaScript, thus solving this thin vs. native issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Enrique!</p>
<p>I hear what you&#8217;re saying, but the argument assumes that Apple will hide native API&#8217;s from their widget engine.  From the keynote, it sorta sounds like they will, but we don&#8217;t know that for sure.  I entirely expect Apple to offer device-specific API&#8217;s via JavaScript, thus solving this thin vs. native issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Enrique Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/379#comment-32699</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Enrique Ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/379#comment-32699</guid>
		<description>Hey Erik....

Killer applications can be developed using web technologies, no doubt about. But thin/web clients they are. There are things that just can&#039;t be done using the web model... Access to native is about taking advantage of the handset&#039;s full capabilities, vs. just purely thin clients; and for now only Apple will be creating such apps. As a person who makes a living out of mobile software, I need both, the ability to write killer web apps, as well as killer local apps. There is room for both, and requirements for both. I know know all that...

ceo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Erik&#8230;.</p>
<p>Killer applications can be developed using web technologies, no doubt about. But thin/web clients they are. There are things that just can&#8217;t be done using the web model&#8230; Access to native is about taking advantage of the handset&#8217;s full capabilities, vs. just purely thin clients; and for now only Apple will be creating such apps. As a person who makes a living out of mobile software, I need both, the ability to write killer web apps, as well as killer local apps. There is room for both, and requirements for both. I know know all that&#8230;</p>
<p>ceo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

