<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying TextMate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/138/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/138</link>
	<description>my little chunk of bandwidth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19854</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/138#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/?p=138#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links Ben!  It&#039;s been awhile since I&#039;ve looked at OS X builds of Emacs, but I&#039;ve never really been into Emacs.  I&#039;ve tried to adopt it in the past, but since I&#039;ve been using vi for, hmm, fifteen years now (wow, has it been that long?), it&#039;s already my terminal-editor of choice.  I&#039;m probably in vim at some point nearly every day, so instead of learning another set of editing/meta commands, I find it easier to bounce between vim and GUI text editors that use common OS X bindings.

Your point is well taken though -- Emacs is a seriously powerful text editor (or, as I&#039;ve heard it said, a pretty nice operating system with a text editor built in ;-)  It&#039;s always amazing to watch people code in Emacs who really grok Emacs.  And for other readers, if you don&#039;t know vi(m) or Emacs, I suggest learning at least one of them if you&#039;re planning to grow your unix-fu.

On a related note, I actually don&#039;t like the GUI builds of vim.  I&#039;m not sure why -- I think it&#039;s because it looks like an OS X app, but doesn&#039;t work like an OS X app.  Plus, a Carbon build of vim doesn&#039;t really offer much more then you can already do from the Terminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links Ben!  It&#8217;s been awhile since I&#8217;ve looked at OS X builds of Emacs, but I&#8217;ve never really been into Emacs.  I&#8217;ve tried to adopt it in the past, but since I&#8217;ve been using vi for, hmm, fifteen years now (wow, has it been that long?), it&#8217;s already my terminal-editor of choice.  I&#8217;m probably in vim at some point nearly every day, so instead of learning another set of editing/meta commands, I find it easier to bounce between vim and GUI text editors that use common OS X bindings.</p>
<p>Your point is well taken though &#8212; Emacs is a seriously powerful text editor (or, as I&#8217;ve heard it said, a pretty nice operating system with a text editor built in ;-)  It&#8217;s always amazing to watch people code in Emacs who really grok Emacs.  And for other readers, if you don&#8217;t know vi(m) or Emacs, I suggest learning at least one of them if you&#8217;re planning to grow your unix-fu.</p>
<p>On a related note, I actually don&#8217;t like the GUI builds of vim.  I&#8217;m not sure why &#8212; I think it&#8217;s because it looks like an OS X app, but doesn&#8217;t work like an OS X app.  Plus, a Carbon build of vim doesn&#8217;t really offer much more then you can already do from the Terminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Bangert</title>
		<link>http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/archives/138#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Bangert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 03:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eriksmartt.com/blog/?p=138#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Carbon Emacs? It has text editing modes for everything out there, even obscure ones. It&#039;ll even properly edit svn files in remote directories that are checked out on remote servers via ssh. (Useful for when the code only runs on a different machine)

The Tiger and Panther package that gives you a handy .app can be found here:
http://home.att.ne.jp/alpha/z123/emacs-mac-e.html

As you&#039;re likely already used to emacs bindings from using OSX, its pretty quick to get started with, and I&#039;ve yet to find anything that can live up to its usefulness. I&#039;ve made a emacs config file that has it using an OSX font and syntax hilighting colors along the lines of BBEdit here:
http://osx.groovie.org/archives/app_51.html

I&#039;ve tried TextMate, and found it rather nice as well, just waiting on the ability to correctly edit remote svn files. It&#039;s also hard to pluck down $50 bucks when emacs still works so well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Carbon Emacs? It has text editing modes for everything out there, even obscure ones. It&#8217;ll even properly edit svn files in remote directories that are checked out on remote servers via ssh. (Useful for when the code only runs on a different machine)</p>
<p>The Tiger and Panther package that gives you a handy .app can be found here:<br />
<a href="http://home.att.ne.jp/alpha/z123/emacs-mac-e.html" rel="nofollow">http://home.att.ne.jp/alpha/z123/emacs-mac-e.html</a></p>
<p>As you&#8217;re likely already used to emacs bindings from using OSX, its pretty quick to get started with, and I&#8217;ve yet to find anything that can live up to its usefulness. I&#8217;ve made a emacs config file that has it using an OSX font and syntax hilighting colors along the lines of BBEdit here:<br />
<a href="http://osx.groovie.org/archives/app_51.html" rel="nofollow">http://osx.groovie.org/archives/app_51.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried TextMate, and found it rather nice as well, just waiting on the ability to correctly edit remote svn files. It&#8217;s also hard to pluck down $50 bucks when emacs still works so well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

